Have Gun, Will Travel…to Work

head t distributivelyer 1 Assume that either the Second Amendment or nation law gives you a legal unspoilt to keep a gas pedal in your car. Do you in like manner ease up a clean right to do this? Do you have a righteous, not sole(prenominal) a legal, right to own a artillery? Do you have either a moral or a legal right to park a car with a loaded gun in a human race put tidy sum irrespective of what the lots owner wants? No, I do not have a moral right keep a gun in my car regardless to the Second Amendment or read law gives me the right to keep a gun in my car. Although having a gun in your car is your legal right, the company insurance may state it is prohibited.The difference between moral and legal is that your legal right supersedes moral rights. In today friendship the law over rides the moral aspect of most situations. If you be parked in a public parking lot and it is posted clearly no weapon concedeed on the dimension thence you essential abide by their r ules. Question 2 In your view, do employees have either a moral or a legal right to park cars with guns in them in the company parking lot? If so, what or so the property rights and skillfulty concerns of employers?If employees dont have this right, would it be good policy for companies to accommodate them to stow guns in their cars anyway? Do companies have good grounds for being concerned close to weapons in their parking lots? Employees do not have the right to disobey company policies regardless of their moral beliefs. When you are employed by a company, no matter how large or teensy-weensy they are, they have some form of written policies on what they expect of the their employees. Most companies have some font of mission statement about maintaining a safe work place environment.No it would not be a good idea for companies to allow guns to be stored in employees cars if at that place is a policy of no weapons in place. Companies have very good reason for been concerned w ith weapon in their parking lots because there are over five hundred work place homicides per year in addition, 1. 5 trillion employees are assaulted at work, many of them by coworkers or former employees. Question 3 Do you twin with the NRA that if companies ban guns from their parking lots, this restriction would take a wrecking ball to the Second Amendment or head off the right of race to have weapons for self-defense?Explain why or why not. In your view, have gun advocates been guilty of politicizing this issuing? Do you think state legislatures are right to get involved, or should the matter be left to companies and employees to settle? No, I do not agree with the NRA that if companies ban guns from their parking lots, this restriction would take a wrecking ball to the Second Amendment or nullify the right of people to have weapons for self defense. The Second Amendment gives the owner of the property the right to refuse weapons on their private property.I olfactory sensa tion everyone believes in the Second Amendment that some people feel more strongly about this issue than others and it is a political issue. The state legislature should not get involved when it pertains to the issue of private property such as company property policies. These types of matters should be left up to the company and their policy makers. Question 4 Because the workplace is the companys private property, the company could choose, if it wished, to allow employees to bring guns not just into the parking lot but into the workplace itself.Are there ever circumstances in which doing so talent be reasonable? Or would the presence of guns automatically violate the rights of other employees to be guaranteed a safe working environment? Some companies allow employees to bring guns not only into the parking lot but into the workplace itself such as police officers, security officers, banks, pawnshops and anywhere the company policy states that guns are allow with the permission of the company. This would not be a violation of the rights of other employees because it is the policy of the company.With such a policy there would have to be some sort of qualification, licensing, and liability. Question 5 What would a libertarian say about this issue? What considerations would a utilitarian have to take into account? What conclusion king he or she draw? A libertarian believes identify justice with an ideal of liberty. Liberty is the prime value, and justice consists in permitting each person to live as he or she pleases, free from interference of others. So, on the matter of gun control in the work place, a libertarian would say, If he or she wants to carry a gun then no one should interfere.Utilitarianism is the moral doctrine that we should always act to produce the greatest likely balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. In this matter a utilitarian would believe that the greatest happiness of all constitutes the standard that determin es whether an action is right or wrong. Question 6 If you were on a companys board of directors, what policy would you recommend regarding handguns, rifles, or other weapons in employees cars? In making your recommendation, what factors would you take into account?Would it make a difference how large the company was, the reputation of its workforce, or where it was located? If you support banning firearms from the parking lot, what steps, if any, do you think the company should take to levy that policy? I would recommend the policy of weapons free workplace which would include handguns, rifles, and other weapons in employees cars on company property. I would factor in the type of business, the nature of the workforce and where its located and then make a sound discussion.If necessary, I would have armed security officers for the safety of the employees and therefore the no weapons policy would still apply. Question 7 Explain whether (and why) you agree or resist with the followin g consideration If employees have the right to keep guns in the parking lot, then they also have a right to bring them into workplace. After all, were only lecture about licensed, responsible owners, and same rationale applies An employee might need a weapon for self-protection. What if a madman starts shooting up the company? I disagree with part of this statement and agree with the other part.I agree with the statement because this is how people think, if they are allowed to bring their guns in the parking lot why not push the boundary and take it inside the building. Yah, youre talking about licensed, responsible owners, and same rationale applies An employee might need a weapon for self-protection. What if a lunatic starts shooting up the company? What if the people allowed to carry that gun on property becomes the lunatic? When policies are put into place theres usually a reason or a ginmill method. Allowing people to have a weapon that close if they get mad or fired would be irresponsible on the companys part.